Inspection is a necessary but non-value-adding activity whose purpose is to protect the customer from poor quality. We should therefore do as little as possible, upon condition that our inspection plan meets the customer’s requirement. Inspection plans with acceptance numbers of zero (c=0) minimize the sample size, albeit at the cost of a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the specified acceptable quality level (AQL).
WHY SHOULD YOU ATTEND?
This presentation will show how to define c=0 plans whose customer protection is equivalent to that of the corresponding ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 (formerly MIL-STD 105) plan.
AREA COVERED
- How to use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4, including the definition of the sampling plan based on the inspection level, acceptable quality level (AQL), and lot size.
- How to use the standard’s switching rules to move between normal, tightened, and reduced inspection where appropriate
- Understand the benefits of double and multiple inspection plans in terms of their ability to accept good lots very quickly, and reject bad ones quickly, to reduce the average sample size.
- Convert any ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan into a zero acceptance number (c=0) plan that provides equivalent or better protection against poor quality at the rejectable quality level (RQL). (ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plans do not have formal RQLs, but we pretend that the nonconforming fraction for which the consumer’s risk of acceptance is 10% is the RQL). A c=0 plan has a smaller sample size than any single, double, multiple, or sequential sampling plan.
- Nothing is free in industrial statistics, though, and the cost of less inspection is a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the AQL. A c=0 plan should therefore be used only when quality is far better than the specified AQL.
- Generate an operating characteristic (OC) curve that compares the protection from the c=0 plan to that of the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan to gain the customer’s agreement for the use of a c=0 plan.
Attendees will also receive an Excel spreadsheet that shows the operating characteristic (OC) curve for a c=0 plan and compares it to the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan. Attendees can replace the example’s specification with their own.
WHO WILL BENEFIT?
- Quality Managers
- Quality Inspectors
- Quality Technicians
- Quality Engineers
- Engineering Departments
This presentation will show how to define c=0 plans whose customer protection is equivalent to that of the corresponding ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 (formerly MIL-STD 105) plan.
- How to use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4, including the definition of the sampling plan based on the inspection level, acceptable quality level (AQL), and lot size.
- How to use the standard’s switching rules to move between normal, tightened, and reduced inspection where appropriate
- Understand the benefits of double and multiple inspection plans in terms of their ability to accept good lots very quickly, and reject bad ones quickly, to reduce the average sample size.
- Convert any ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan into a zero acceptance number (c=0) plan that provides equivalent or better protection against poor quality at the rejectable quality level (RQL). (ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plans do not have formal RQLs, but we pretend that the nonconforming fraction for which the consumer’s risk of acceptance is 10% is the RQL). A c=0 plan has a smaller sample size than any single, double, multiple, or sequential sampling plan.
- Nothing is free in industrial statistics, though, and the cost of less inspection is a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the AQL. A c=0 plan should therefore be used only when quality is far better than the specified AQL.
- Generate an operating characteristic (OC) curve that compares the protection from the c=0 plan to that of the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan to gain the customer’s agreement for the use of a c=0 plan.
Attendees will also receive an Excel spreadsheet that shows the operating characteristic (OC) curve for a c=0 plan and compares it to the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan. Attendees can replace the example’s specification with their own.
- Quality Managers
- Quality Inspectors
- Quality Technicians
- Quality Engineers
- Engineering Departments
Speaker Profile
William A. Levinson, P.E., is the principal of Levinson Productivity Systems, P.C. He is an ASQ Fellow, Certified Quality Engineer, Quality Auditor, Quality Manager, Reliability Engineer, and Six Sigma Black Belt. He is also the author of several books on quality, productivity, and management, of which the most recent is The Expanded and Annotated My Life and Work: Henry Ford’s Universal Code for World-Class Success.
Upcoming Webinars
Managing Difficult Employee Conversations
I-9 Audits: Strengthening Your Immigration Compliance Strat…
Dealing With Difficult People In Life & Work
Predictive Accounting: Driver-Based Budgeting And Rolling F…
Pay Equity Changes for 2024! What Employers Need to Know to…
Leader Branding: How to Communicate with Confidence to Attr…
Project Management for Non-Project Managers - How to commun…
Design Verification, Validation and Testing for Medical Dev…
Data Integrity and Privacy: Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11,…
FFIEC BSA/AML Examination Manual: What Compliance Officers …
Why EBITDA Doesn't Spell Cash Flow and What Does
Harassment, Bullying, Gossip, Confrontational and Disruptiv…
Employee or Independent Contractor – U.S DOL Announces 2024…
How to Survive an Emotionally Toxic Workplace
Best Practices in Complaint Management for Regulatory Compl…
Human Factors Usability Studies Following ISO 62366 and FDA…
Ensuring Safe and Effective Pharmaceutical Products: A Comp…
Gossip-Free: Leadership Techniques to Quell Office Chatter
Updated Metro 2®, e-OSCAR and the New Tougher FCRA/CFPB Com…
Embracing Diversity and Inclusion in Talent Acquisition
Form W-9 Compliance to Avoid Penalties: TIN Verification, B…
Tattoos, hijabs, piercings, and pink hair: The challenges …
Understanding and Analyzing Financial Statements
Divorce, Adoption and Other Special Tax Topics
Design History File (DHF), the Device Master Record (DMR) a…
With Mandatory Paid Leave Gaining Ground Is It Time To Do A…
Setting up Quality System for FDA Regulated Products: Tips …
Is Your Culture Working For or Against Your Success? If You…
Marketing to Medicare or Medicaid Beneficiaries - What You …
The Five Cs Of Commercial Credit: The Basic Elements Of Cre…
Sunshine Act Reporting - Clarification for Clinical Research
Documenting Misconduct that Will Stand Up in Court
Stress, Change And Team Resilience Through Humor: An Intera…
FDA Regulation of Artificial Intelligence/ Machine Learning
Managing Toxic & Other Employees Who have Attitude Issues
Excel - Lists and Tables - A Beginner's Guide to Managing L…
Pharma 4.0: Next Generation Technology Approach to GxP Prod…
Patient Gifts, Discounts and Freebies: What You Can and Can…
Managing Complex Projects - Project Management
All About Civility - Eliminating a Culture of Gossip Rumors…
From Challenges to Compliance: Understanding Dietary Supple…
Improving Employee Engagement & Retention Through Stay Inte…
How To Conduct An Internal Harassment And Bullying Investig…